Writing question: In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Sample essay band 7.5:
The ongoing debate on whether governments should impose higher taxes on car ownership is highly controversial. In my view, this is a short-sighted answer with numerous drawbacks and should not be implemented.
Regarding the negative side of the solution on debate, it deprives people of a safe means of transportation and goes against the development of a civilized society. Observing from an economic perspective, the action will exert detrimental effects on the automobile manufacturing industry, leading to a devastating blow to the economy. Furthermore, considering public transport can never offer the same level of flexibility and availability that private vehicles do, forcing people to use public transport will pose a great inconvenience to their daily life. It is safe to assume that such an aggressive sudden implementation will certainly disrupt absolutely every aspect of life as we know it today. More importantly, the solution is only temporary itself, as road-traffic infrastructures are still incapable of handling such an ever-increasing number of vehicles.
Despite these massive drawbacks, implementing the policy can temporarily ease the situation down. It will lessen the number of cars in traffic, therefore reducing traffic congestion. More people will use public transport whether it is in their favor or not, thus increasing its budget and leading to better services. The groups that benefit the most from this implementation are the students, the lower class, and the elderly, those who already use public transport as their primary method of transportation.
To conclude, although this policy offers several benefits, it raises serious concerns. I stand by the opinion that the solution is inefficient and faulty.
Written by An